How to deal with the peer review process?
Peer review process is an utmost important part of the academic publishing industry. Eventually, there are enormous responsibilities that lie with the scholars to deliver the accuracy and research reproducibility; the standard peer-review process can help make the scientific research paper the best it can be when the accurate quality check is provided.
Recently there is a buzz that is highlighting the substandard peer review process in open access journals, and journals have augmented the need for the funders, authors, publishers and academic institutes to ensure the quality of peer review in journals.
The more transparency in peer review, the more quality peer review is done. Peer review is essential to maintain the distinction of the published scientific works.
Many cases are stated for ethical desecration for publishing the destructive research, false peer review and for wrong information, hence improving the quality of the peer-review process has become very important
Previously the journal’s editors screened the manuscript that is submitted to the journal. Still, today there is an enormous paper that is ready to submit and publish in a different discipline. Therefore, here comes a need of the subject expert to evaluate the manuscript and to screen before reaching the final decision.
Peer review is an evaluation and proper assessment of the manuscript and will highlight the required changes and give feedback. The decision of acceptance and rejection of the manuscript is remaining with the journal editors.
Types of peer review :
The types of peer review, are single-blind check and double-blind check, open peer review, post-publication peer review. The type depends on the journal, and the purpose is to authenticate and assure the quality of the manuscript.
Standardize the peer review
Most journals follow the same workflow of peer review, but some journals have different feature. Adopt new approaches and advancement in peer review may bring some challenges but can be impressively authentic for maintaining the quality.
Peer review is used to check the quality of the manuscript before sending the research community. The quality checkers must follow the ethical rules in each phase of peer review process.
Sometimes the number of papers increased, so it can be overloaded for the reviewer to check, hence cooperate to more experts from the developing countries can help you check carefully.
Give the reviewer more training and guidance for the peer review it will help to improve the performance.
Appreciate the quality checker
Keep the reviewer motivated by giving them acknowledgment and recognition for the contribution in maintaining the quality will boost their motivation to do more quality work.
Problems of peer review
The problems of peer review may include delays, bias decisions, plagiarism and some other reasons.
How to deal with peer review?
The feedback can vary from small to significant revisions or may include a request for advancement in the manuscript. Usually journals accept manuscripts after all the reviewers’ remarks are catered. Authors have to follow the guidelines while sending the revised work.
The process of peer review is envisioned to give a contribution to academic publishing and authenticate science research. The peer review aims to maintain the high quality of published journals. Peer review is vital to the publishing industry; in the modern digital age, it has become significantly crucial for reducing the duplicity and the less formal paper.
The peer review process involves exposing the authors work and the research to the analysis of the other expert in the same subject to patterned its validity and check the appropriateness for the publication. Fundamentally peer review provide help to the publisher and give feedback regarding the work should be accepted or not.