How should researchers read papers during COVID 19
The academic publishing businesses have been affected by this pandemic situation all over the world. Publication support services in UK is a sudden change in priorities of the literary industry, and this creates a significant challenge for the researchers, and publishers have shifted their focus more towards this COVID 19 articles.
Coronavirus related articles have produced much information and misinformation and caused many funders at risk.
Preprints have shared approximately 60000 articles related to the COVID 19 articles from the beginning before the peer review process or quality check, and this creates a huge buzz.
Among all the sudden changes in the industry, the researcher should change the way to read the scientific papers.
There are a lot of peoples who are reading the scientific papers to know about the Coronavirus, some reports are low quality, and some are from the china sources of the wide-ranging articles that have vital information related to the disease. Critically, the published papers in preprint spreading wrong data related to the virus or frequent claims.
The peer review aims to authenticate the research paper, and this will let people decide which article to read and which not.
Ideally, we read the paper and get influenced from data given in the articles no matter from which sources it is coming from, we deluged with the information. Hence, readers find the most comfortable way and short papers to get some information.
What to trust?
When you are daze with lots of information, you tend to find the information in shortcuts and go through the multiple types of research by searching with the scientist names or institutes names because they have gained the reputations as an authenticate resources.
Publication support services in UK information is coming from the scientists of China, about the virus, and is not blowout to the global audience. So these papers help the people to know more about the disease and helping them to explore how rapidly it is increasing among the people.
Barry Bloom says that the errands preferences over the new ideas and this is not a useful technique to identify the papers; this is the risk for the COVID 19 articles.
Initially, this pandemic began from China and then widely spread to Europe and other countries of Asia before spreading out the US, so that means there is broader information that is given by the China scientists. The published paper by China helped to know the more the virus and how it is inducing and effected in the human body.
Barry Bloom also says the important vision about the telling the COVID is coming from Italy and Spain researchers who also was not well-known among the audience.
With the enormous articles on Coronavirus, how will the researcher decide which paper to be readable that is valid? The approach to read the report is the key.
Approach to read Papers
A professor from McGill University “Jonathan” once suggested that the researcher ask him or herself a question that “can I trust that what I have read?”
Jonathan agrees with Barry statements that trust the paper which is authorized by the institutes and authors is the most common practice, whether it is helpful or not. We ignore researches from less known researchers, and this practice discourages the new researchers because these young scientists might not have published the long articles, but that does not show the accuracy of the article.
Chinese consultations have published some articles, and that included the misinformation such as the hydroxychloroquine, and that is highly biased with many researchers.
The thing that you can learn from this article is that try approach to read different articles from different scientists, with open judgment on the assessment of the quality of the paper. There is some improvisation that should be considered by the researchers while reading the articles